|
My experience with my custom tattos has been very positive. However, I have noticed a common inconsistency in various print media that I would love to see discussed.
On one hand, many 'advice' columns, websites, etc. say the customer is the Boss. The concept, and the final word are always his or hers. The artist is expected to aquiesce to the customer's whims (or reasoned ideas, whatever.) Part 2 of the RAB FAQ has a good example of this.
On the other hand, in many magazines and other interview platforms, many artists express the desire for a customer who enters the studio, and says, 'do me, I trust you.'
As a craftsman of a somewhat different sort than the tattoo artist (I build large musical contraptions), I can nevertheless understand the compelling nature of a willing client. However, I am curious about the seemingly opposing opinions expressed by experts in the tattooing arts.
I know that personally I would have a very tough time allowing even a great artist to work on me without some idea of what I like and hate. I'm curious how any artist could want to do something so permanent, that may not be appreciated.
|